82P and 83P No FG Kennedy Halves
Moderator: Daniel
Forum rules
Here's a link to how to post a topic with images in our community https://coinauctionshelp.com/welcome-to ... community/
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
You also agree to follow these guidelines. You must agree to these rules to be a member of this forum. NO SPAM! Spam is deleted within minutes, no spam will ever be left in our community.
1. Post a front and back image of your coin with a specific question about what you’re seeing or asking about and one coin per topic.
2. Please remove coin from the holder unless it’s US or an official mint case or unless it is graded by a grading service.
3. Images should be taken by a camera or cell phone camera, we ask that members don’t use images through a microscope screen.
4. Always start your own topic, please don’t ask about your coin or post your coin in someone else’s coin topic.
5. Do not send private messages about your coin unless an Admin ask you too and the same for sending emails through the board.
6. No spam. Do not post any links to your coin or other non-coin websites.
7. Always be respectful even if something makes you upset or you don’t agree with a member. You can always get a second opinion elsewhere. If you have an issue then politely ask an admin in an PM. PM’s are for issues, technical and personal, but not for coin questions (refer to number 5 on this list). Our community is not a soap box for complaining or drama, so please refrain from doing so here.[/size]
Here's a link to how to post a topic with images in our community https://coinauctionshelp.com/welcome-to ... community/
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
You also agree to follow these guidelines. You must agree to these rules to be a member of this forum. NO SPAM! Spam is deleted within minutes, no spam will ever be left in our community.
1. Post a front and back image of your coin with a specific question about what you’re seeing or asking about and one coin per topic.
2. Please remove coin from the holder unless it’s US or an official mint case or unless it is graded by a grading service.
3. Images should be taken by a camera or cell phone camera, we ask that members don’t use images through a microscope screen.
4. Always start your own topic, please don’t ask about your coin or post your coin in someone else’s coin topic.
5. Do not send private messages about your coin unless an Admin ask you too and the same for sending emails through the board.
6. No spam. Do not post any links to your coin or other non-coin websites.
7. Always be respectful even if something makes you upset or you don’t agree with a member. You can always get a second opinion elsewhere. If you have an issue then politely ask an admin in an PM. PM’s are for issues, technical and personal, but not for coin questions (refer to number 5 on this list). Our community is not a soap box for complaining or drama, so please refrain from doing so here.[/size]
-
- Coinasieur
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2020 12:06 pm
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
82P and 83P No FG Kennedy Halves
Going through my pile of coins that I set aside during my silver hunt and found these two coins back to back! While not a whole lot of value here, it is still neat to find. Now here is my question for the higher ups (and the more experienced)...Why are some No FG's recognized by Fivas Stanton and yet others are not? The 82p has been designated as the FS-901 but not the 83p. This holds true among other types of coins as well (Lincoln Cents).
-
- Coin Expert
- Posts: 1485
- Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2021 8:49 pm
- Location: Tecumseh, OK
- Has thanked: 274 times
- Been thanked: 350 times
Re: 82P and 83P No FG Kennedy Halves
1983-P no FG could be a discovery coin? I legitimately don't see the FG at all . . .
Also, the no FG could be a grease strike on other coins, the 1982-P no FG was an over-polished die
Also, the no FG could be a grease strike on other coins, the 1982-P no FG was an over-polished die
You are never too old to learn something new
- Paul
- Master Die Variety Examiner
- Posts: 18845
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 9:19 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
- Has thanked: 897 times
- Been thanked: 3274 times
Re: 82P and 83P No FG Kennedy Halves
The missing designers initials on the 1982 KHD specimens are the result of a "Abraded Die".
CONECA has this listed as ADR-001
It's important that you keep in mind how small and shallow these DI's are....... which in turn makes them very easy to polish off or become plugged. That's why it's important to be able to determine the "Die State" of the coin struck.
Many of the true missing design element specimens that have been certified, have had their dies inspected (as I have been told).
CONECA has this listed as ADR-001
It's important that you keep in mind how small and shallow these DI's are....... which in turn makes them very easy to polish off or become plugged. That's why it's important to be able to determine the "Die State" of the coin struck.
Many of the true missing design element specimens that have been certified, have had their dies inspected (as I have been told).
- Earle42
- Administrator
- Posts: 15577
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2019 11:18 am
- Location: OH
- Has thanked: 1330 times
- Been thanked: 4878 times
Re: 82P and 83P No FG Kennedy Halves
I have an entire essay on just the No FG Kennedy halves linked to in my signature. It is a comprehensive, data filled (with links), study into the No FG varieties as slabbed by the "professionals" at PCGS
You find the facts about the only actual (non-die abrasion) No FG made in 1982 (the rest of listed dates are from dies where polishing removed SOME of the FG), how to tell an actual 1982 No FG without even looking at the REV (Kennedy Half specialist rookie-level info that PCGS slabs indicate PCGS is unaware of), many pictures of PCGS photos of wrongly attributed/slabbed halves that have cost collectors with blind faith in the company thousands of dollars, and how PCGS breaks their own rules of what they say (and the hobby as shown with quotations from main hobby sources) makes up an actual No FG coin.
The paper is an eye opener as to ineptitude the companies have over this aspect of the hobby. They claim three trained and expert graders minimum look at each coin. They also claim each coin is assigned to graders having a specialty in that coin. Yet these slabs show a great deal of ineptitude, or else the company is not grading according to their own statement of how they grade coins.
You find the facts about the only actual (non-die abrasion) No FG made in 1982 (the rest of listed dates are from dies where polishing removed SOME of the FG), how to tell an actual 1982 No FG without even looking at the REV (Kennedy Half specialist rookie-level info that PCGS slabs indicate PCGS is unaware of), many pictures of PCGS photos of wrongly attributed/slabbed halves that have cost collectors with blind faith in the company thousands of dollars, and how PCGS breaks their own rules of what they say (and the hobby as shown with quotations from main hobby sources) makes up an actual No FG coin.
The paper is an eye opener as to ineptitude the companies have over this aspect of the hobby. They claim three trained and expert graders minimum look at each coin. They also claim each coin is assigned to graders having a specialty in that coin. Yet these slabs show a great deal of ineptitude, or else the company is not grading according to their own statement of how they grade coins.
- These users thanked the author Earle42 for the post (total 2):
- AverageStacker, Daniel
- Rating: 6.06%
Common grading company shortcomings & resulting co$tly mi$take$ to collectors (using Kennedy No FG halves):
https://tinyurl.com/y7rksxu8
How much squash would a sasquatch squash if a sasquatch would squash squash?
https://tinyurl.com/y7rksxu8
How much squash would a sasquatch squash if a sasquatch would squash squash?
-
- Coinasieur
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2020 12:06 pm
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: 82P and 83P No FG Kennedy Halves
I am eagerly looking forward to reading this
This is quite interesting when thinking about this overall. Both my 72D No FG's and the 83P (posted above) you can tell that there has been a lot of polishing as the design elements appear quite worn down around the tail feathers etc. On the 82P posted above, this is not the case and is the first time I've seen any "No FG" with that kind of detail around that area.You find the facts about the only actual (non-die abrasion) No FG made in 1982 (the rest of listed dates are from dies where polishing removed SOME of the FG), how to tell an actual 1982 No FG without even looking at the REV (Kennedy Half specialist rookie-level info that PCGS slabs indicate PCGS is unaware of)
-
- Coinasieur
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2020 12:06 pm
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: 82P and 83P No FG Kennedy Halves
Well, I can tell you one thing....I'll be looking at that "1" when I get home tonight on the 82!Earle42 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 11:09 am
You find the facts about the only actual (non-die abrasion) No FG made in 1982 (the rest of listed dates are from dies where polishing removed SOME of the FG), how to tell an actual 1982 No FG without even looking at the REV (Kennedy Half specialist rookie-level info that PCGS slabs indicate PCGS is unaware of)
-
- Coinasieur
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2020 12:06 pm
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: 82P and 83P No FG Kennedy Halves
Just to make sure I'm understanding you properly, "Abraded Die" means the die was polished and the initials were removed by such, correct?
I recently went to CONECA for help in getting a No FG Penny recognized, but was flat out told that they would not because it wasn't an actual error, but just an over zealous mint employee overpolishing.
- Paul
- Master Die Variety Examiner
- Posts: 18845
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 9:19 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
- Has thanked: 897 times
- Been thanked: 3274 times
Re: 82P and 83P No FG Kennedy Halves
Yes to your abraded die question....
Can you post an image of what you have for the no FG cent?
Can you post an image of what you have for the no FG cent?
- Daniel
- Administrator
- Posts: 26236
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:59 pm
- Location: Ohio
- Has thanked: 1123 times
- Been thanked: 4093 times
- Contact:
-
- Coinasieur
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2020 12:06 pm
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: 82P and 83P No FG Kennedy Halves
- Earle42
- Administrator
- Posts: 15577
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2019 11:18 am
- Location: OH
- Has thanked: 1330 times
- Been thanked: 4878 times
Re: 82P and 83P No FG Kennedy Halves
Thanks for posting the video Daniel. I had lost the URL to it.
Common grading company shortcomings & resulting co$tly mi$take$ to collectors (using Kennedy No FG halves):
https://tinyurl.com/y7rksxu8
How much squash would a sasquatch squash if a sasquatch would squash squash?
https://tinyurl.com/y7rksxu8
How much squash would a sasquatch squash if a sasquatch would squash squash?
-
- Coinasieur
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2020 12:06 pm
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: 82P and 83P No FG Kennedy Halves
So basically what I'm hearing is that the 82P is the only true No FG possible as the die was not engraved with the initials. All others are solely due to the result of over-polishing the dies and thereby none of them SHOULD be recognized as a No FG. That makes a whole lot more sense than some being recognized (72D Kennedy, 69D Lincoln Cent) and not others.
- Earle42
- Administrator
- Posts: 15577
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2019 11:18 am
- Location: OH
- Has thanked: 1330 times
- Been thanked: 4878 times
Re: 82P and 83P No FG Kennedy Halves
At present, I would say correct.
The 72-D, 66 SMS, and 83 are the most known for what appears to be missing an FG. But I have seen other dates as well.
Since the grading companies offer (for a fee of course) to put "No FG" on the label, its a money maker for them and they include them as if they were legit die errors.
Now if a "No FG" 72-D or 66 shows up with no evidence of die polishing (worn features) around the area where the initials should be, then it would likely be from a legitimate die b/c there would be no reason for a polisher to go in and polish of just the tiny initials.
I can say as of the date on the essay, none of the No FGs of 72-D and 66 SMS slabbed coins did not evidence polishing. In other words, none of them, despite people spending thousands on some, b/c PCGS will slab them, were likely from a die with No FG engraved in it.
Money talks.
As to whether or not the others SHOULD be called No FG varieties, my opinion (note that word) is they could label them as Polished Off FG (or something more eloquent) to be completely honest ...if PCGS is even aware of all of this information, which I am hoping b/c otherwise it seems, at least to me, a bit like PCGS is taking advantage of legitimate collector ignorance.
After all, the first person to note the 72-D "No FG" was a president of PCGS - Ron Guth. You would think with the reputation people give this company for being THE experts, their own "experts" would have known and told him it was only a polishing problem.
I have a 1988 with no trace of FG. It s also very late dies state and so most likely is polished off (I have seen these) and the bad condition of the die took care of the rest of the initials showing up.
But this is not the only case of a polishing problem being slabbed as a legit error with half dollars. The 1945 no AW half is also from polishing off the initials. Yet b/c the registry sets recognize these, PCGA can make money slabbing them...and it keeps a lot of people in the dark.
BTW - I went through many boxes over a 2 year period. I saved each 72-D, 83, and 88 I could find that appeared not to have the initials. These were the main circulated dates used after the initial were partially polished off. The best ones are in my collection labeled as "Polished Off FG," simply for fun and the fact I cannot see it there. But again, its obvious they were polished from the surrounding weak features.
The 72-D, 66 SMS, and 83 are the most known for what appears to be missing an FG. But I have seen other dates as well.
Since the grading companies offer (for a fee of course) to put "No FG" on the label, its a money maker for them and they include them as if they were legit die errors.
Now if a "No FG" 72-D or 66 shows up with no evidence of die polishing (worn features) around the area where the initials should be, then it would likely be from a legitimate die b/c there would be no reason for a polisher to go in and polish of just the tiny initials.
I can say as of the date on the essay, none of the No FGs of 72-D and 66 SMS slabbed coins did not evidence polishing. In other words, none of them, despite people spending thousands on some, b/c PCGS will slab them, were likely from a die with No FG engraved in it.
Money talks.
As to whether or not the others SHOULD be called No FG varieties, my opinion (note that word) is they could label them as Polished Off FG (or something more eloquent) to be completely honest ...if PCGS is even aware of all of this information, which I am hoping b/c otherwise it seems, at least to me, a bit like PCGS is taking advantage of legitimate collector ignorance.
After all, the first person to note the 72-D "No FG" was a president of PCGS - Ron Guth. You would think with the reputation people give this company for being THE experts, their own "experts" would have known and told him it was only a polishing problem.
I have a 1988 with no trace of FG. It s also very late dies state and so most likely is polished off (I have seen these) and the bad condition of the die took care of the rest of the initials showing up.
But this is not the only case of a polishing problem being slabbed as a legit error with half dollars. The 1945 no AW half is also from polishing off the initials. Yet b/c the registry sets recognize these, PCGA can make money slabbing them...and it keeps a lot of people in the dark.
BTW - I went through many boxes over a 2 year period. I saved each 72-D, 83, and 88 I could find that appeared not to have the initials. These were the main circulated dates used after the initial were partially polished off. The best ones are in my collection labeled as "Polished Off FG," simply for fun and the fact I cannot see it there. But again, its obvious they were polished from the surrounding weak features.
Common grading company shortcomings & resulting co$tly mi$take$ to collectors (using Kennedy No FG halves):
https://tinyurl.com/y7rksxu8
How much squash would a sasquatch squash if a sasquatch would squash squash?
https://tinyurl.com/y7rksxu8
How much squash would a sasquatch squash if a sasquatch would squash squash?
-
- Coinasieur
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2020 12:06 pm
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
- Earle42
- Administrator
- Posts: 15577
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2019 11:18 am
- Location: OH
- Has thanked: 1330 times
- Been thanked: 4878 times
Re: 82P and 83P No FG Kennedy Halves
Wow!
The companies are in the business of making profit - like any company legitimately is.
The sad part is that the non-legit ones go for a lot more than the legit 82s! But the marketing/profit-generating idea of registry sets, thus driving up demand and prices, is more fun to those who enjoy the registry sets when there are more varieties (challenge) recognized by the companies.
i think it would be hard for the hobby to reject these as a whole, especially after a lot of people have a lot of money into them (another sad story of buy the slab and not the coin).
The companies are in the business of making profit - like any company legitimately is.
The sad part is that the non-legit ones go for a lot more than the legit 82s! But the marketing/profit-generating idea of registry sets, thus driving up demand and prices, is more fun to those who enjoy the registry sets when there are more varieties (challenge) recognized by the companies.
i think it would be hard for the hobby to reject these as a whole, especially after a lot of people have a lot of money into them (another sad story of buy the slab and not the coin).
Common grading company shortcomings & resulting co$tly mi$take$ to collectors (using Kennedy No FG halves):
https://tinyurl.com/y7rksxu8
How much squash would a sasquatch squash if a sasquatch would squash squash?
https://tinyurl.com/y7rksxu8
How much squash would a sasquatch squash if a sasquatch would squash squash?
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 6 Replies
- 400 Views
-
Last post by aggieengineer
-
- 1 Replies
- 492 Views
-
Last post by SensibleSal66
-
- 2 Replies
- 885 Views
-
Last post by Paul
-
- 6 Replies
- 439 Views
-
Last post by Earle42
-
- 4 Replies
- 143 Views
-
Last post by Earle42
-
- 1 Replies
- 325 Views
-
Last post by Earle42
-
- 7 Replies
- 1547 Views
-
Last post by DSCoins
-
- 1 Replies
- 822 Views
-
Last post by Daniel
-
- 3 Replies
- 3486 Views
-
Last post by Paul
-
- 5 Replies
- 2455 Views
-
Last post by Daniel