1971 S Non-proof dime
Moderator: Daniel
Forum rules
Here's a link to how to post a topic with images in our community https://coinauctionshelp.com/welcome-to ... community/
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
You also agree to follow these guidelines. You must agree to these rules to be a member of this forum. NO SPAM! Spam is deleted within minutes, no spam will ever be left in our community.
1. Post a front and back image of your coin with a specific question about what you’re seeing or asking about and one coin per topic.
2. Please remove coin from the holder unless it’s US or an official mint case or unless it is graded by a grading service.
3. Images should be taken by a camera or cell phone camera, we ask that members don’t use images through a microscope screen.
4. Always start your own topic, please don’t ask about your coin or post your coin in someone else’s coin topic.
5. Do not send private messages about your coin unless an Admin ask you too and the same for sending emails through the board.
6. No spam. Do not post any links to your coin or other non-coin websites.
7. Always be respectful even if something makes you upset or you don’t agree with a member. You can always get a second opinion elsewhere. If you have an issue then politely ask an admin in an PM. PM’s are for issues, technical and personal, but not for coin questions (refer to number 5 on this list). Our community is not a soap box for complaining or drama, so please refrain from doing so here.[/size]
Here's a link to how to post a topic with images in our community https://coinauctionshelp.com/welcome-to ... community/
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
You also agree to follow these guidelines. You must agree to these rules to be a member of this forum. NO SPAM! Spam is deleted within minutes, no spam will ever be left in our community.
1. Post a front and back image of your coin with a specific question about what you’re seeing or asking about and one coin per topic.
2. Please remove coin from the holder unless it’s US or an official mint case or unless it is graded by a grading service.
3. Images should be taken by a camera or cell phone camera, we ask that members don’t use images through a microscope screen.
4. Always start your own topic, please don’t ask about your coin or post your coin in someone else’s coin topic.
5. Do not send private messages about your coin unless an Admin ask you too and the same for sending emails through the board.
6. No spam. Do not post any links to your coin or other non-coin websites.
7. Always be respectful even if something makes you upset or you don’t agree with a member. You can always get a second opinion elsewhere. If you have an issue then politely ask an admin in an PM. PM’s are for issues, technical and personal, but not for coin questions (refer to number 5 on this list). Our community is not a soap box for complaining or drama, so please refrain from doing so here.[/size]
-
- Coining Around
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2021 9:17 pm
1971 S Non-proof dime
So I was going through some dime roles and came across this. It doesn't appear to have ever been a proof strike and i couldn't find anything other than that for dimes minted from SF that year. Thoughts?
-
- Coin Guru
- Posts: 5064
- Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2021 7:01 pm
- Location: Monroe, NY
- Has thanked: 506 times
- Been thanked: 1304 times
- Matthudson
- Coin Wizz
- Posts: 731
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2021 11:41 am
- Has thanked: 164 times
- Been thanked: 182 times
- Daniel
- Administrator
- Posts: 26236
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:59 pm
- Location: Ohio
- Has thanked: 1123 times
- Been thanked: 4093 times
- Contact:
- DSCoins
- Coin Guru
- Posts: 3453
- Joined: Thu May 16, 2019 7:47 pm
- Location: South central PA.
- Has thanked: 157 times
- Been thanked: 931 times
Re: 1971 S Non-proof dime
Actually Daniel there is a S above the date.
USN Retired Jun1977-Jun 1997/100% disabled VET. (Not a wounded warrior)
Member CONACA
ANA
PCGS
NGC
Finds to date
2000-P .05C Strong Clashed Die O/R PCGS # 14129072 photo at maddieclashes
1983-P DDR FS-01-1983-501
5 2000 WAM FS- 901
Member CONACA
ANA
PCGS
NGC
Finds to date
2000-P .05C Strong Clashed Die O/R PCGS # 14129072 photo at maddieclashes
1983-P DDR FS-01-1983-501
5 2000 WAM FS- 901
- Paul
- Master Die Variety Examiner
- Posts: 18841
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 9:19 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
- Has thanked: 897 times
- Been thanked: 3274 times
- Daniel
- Administrator
- Posts: 26236
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:59 pm
- Location: Ohio
- Has thanked: 1123 times
- Been thanked: 4093 times
- Contact:
- Earle42
- Administrator
- Posts: 15577
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2019 11:18 am
- Location: OH
- Has thanked: 1330 times
- Been thanked: 4876 times
Re: 1971 S Non-proof dime
???
I really hate to disagree...but I there is no mintage listed for 1971 S non-proof dimes.
Sometimes proof coins get put into circulation and take on the look of a normal strike coin. These are called "impaired proofs."
Common grading company shortcomings & resulting co$tly mi$take$ to collectors (using Kennedy No FG halves):
https://tinyurl.com/y7rksxu8
How much squash would a sasquatch squash if a sasquatch would squash squash?
https://tinyurl.com/y7rksxu8
How much squash would a sasquatch squash if a sasquatch would squash squash?
- Daniel
- Administrator
- Posts: 26236
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:59 pm
- Location: Ohio
- Has thanked: 1123 times
- Been thanked: 4093 times
- Contact:
Re: 1971 S Non-proof dime
You're correct Earle I am just not thinking and not sure why I got this all confused here. Thanks!
-
- Coin Expert
- Posts: 1485
- Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2021 8:49 pm
- Location: Tecumseh, OK
- Has thanked: 274 times
- Been thanked: 350 times
Re: 1971 S Non-proof dime
This is Likely a highly-Circulated Proof Dime, all of the proof markers are gone, it's still a Proof since San Francisco stopped making circulating Dimes since the 1950s
You are never too old to learn something new
- Earle42
- Administrator
- Posts: 15577
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2019 11:18 am
- Location: OH
- Has thanked: 1330 times
- Been thanked: 4876 times
Re: 1971 S Non-proof dime
What??? YOU are a human being also???You're correct Earle I am just not thinking and not sure why I got this all confused here. Thanks!
And here I had you on a pedestal above the unquestionably-above-us-peons-never-wrong-and-ultra-correct-at-all-times-b/c-the-slab's-label-says-says-so group of "THE EXPERTS" at the grading companies!
i think I need to go drown myself in a glass of Pepsi after this shocking revelation!
Woe is me!
Common grading company shortcomings & resulting co$tly mi$take$ to collectors (using Kennedy No FG halves):
https://tinyurl.com/y7rksxu8
How much squash would a sasquatch squash if a sasquatch would squash squash?
https://tinyurl.com/y7rksxu8
How much squash would a sasquatch squash if a sasquatch would squash squash?
- Daniel
- Administrator
- Posts: 26236
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:59 pm
- Location: Ohio
- Has thanked: 1123 times
- Been thanked: 4093 times
- Contact:
Re: 1971 S Non-proof dime
LMAO!Earle42 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 13, 2021 4:55 pmWhat??? YOU are a human being also???You're correct Earle I am just not thinking and not sure why I got this all confused here. Thanks!
And here I had you on a pedestal above the unquestionably-above-us-peons-never-wrong-and-ultra-correct-at-all-times-b/c-the-slab's-label-says-says-so group of "THE EXPERTS" at the grading companies!
i think I need to go drown myself in a glass of Pepsi after this shocking revelation!
Woe is me!
- muswell65
- Coin Wizz
- Posts: 220
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2021 1:45 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
- Has thanked: 323 times
- Been thanked: 84 times
Re: 1971 S Non-proof dime
Here is a great example of how it's possible to have a disagreement without taking anything personally, presented to us by Senior Management. To all board members, the leadership here talks the talk and walks the walk, so take notice! Everyone is here to learn, so be open to all discussion, even disagreements. We're all better for it. Thanks Daniel and Earle for setting the proper tone for this outstanding forum!Daniel wrote: ↑Mon Sep 13, 2021 6:27 pmLMAO!Earle42 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 13, 2021 4:55 pmWhat??? YOU are a human being also???You're correct Earle I am just not thinking and not sure why I got this all confused here. Thanks!
And here I had you on a pedestal above the unquestionably-above-us-peons-never-wrong-and-ultra-correct-at-all-times-b/c-the-slab's-label-says-says-so group of "THE EXPERTS" at the grading companies!
i think I need to go drown myself in a glass of Pepsi after this shocking revelation!
Woe is me!
Best,
Jeff
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 8 Replies
- 1527 Views
-
Last post by budung
-
- 6 Replies
- 244 Views
-
Last post by silviosi
-
- 5 Replies
- 804 Views
-
Last post by Earle42
-
- 2 Replies
- 8326 Views
-
Last post by Paul
-
- 8 Replies
- 809 Views
-
Last post by pnwmakes
-
- 5 Replies
- 990 Views
-
Last post by Earle42
-
- 6 Replies
- 207 Views
-
Last post by Earle42
-
- 3 Replies
- 1743 Views
-
Last post by Daniel
-
- 3 Replies
- 418 Views
-
Last post by Earle42
-
- 5 Replies
- 3853 Views
-
Last post by Earle42